Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to abdi.dev

Abdilaziz Ibrahim · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
abdilazizibrahim.dev
Abdilaziz Ibrahim
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
mathpholio.dev
Mathpholio!
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
mattfuss.com
Matthew Fuss Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
robertdelacruz.com
Robert De La Cruz | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
fdomillan.com
FdoMillan´s Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
nikolagp.com
Nikola Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
ahnaf-tajwar.com
Ahnaf's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
nickabate.dev
nickabate.dev - backend developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
mazereeuw.dev
Cas Mazereeuw - Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
newen.dev
Nahuel Bogado - Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andybyungjoopark.com
Byungjoo Park - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
nicoleselig.com
Nicole's Portfolio and Blog
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
piotrszaran.com
Piotr Szaran — Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
angel1254.com
AngelFolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
ariesme.com
AriesMe
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
aryanparikh.com
Aryan Parikh | Developer & Creator
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
fandres51.com
fandres51
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
matnazar.dev
Matnazar Matnazarov | Backend Developer & Data Engineer | Matnazar Matnazarov
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.