Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to abdallaali.dev

Abdalla Ali — Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
ayjaygee.dev
AJ — Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
jjdorko.com
JJ Dorko — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ritikgoyal.com
Ritik Goyal — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
niranjangaonkar.com
Niranjan Gaonkar — Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
alexolvera.dev
Alex Olvera — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
byavi.dev
Avi Gupta — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
alamgir.dev
Alamgir Khan — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
rohitushir.com
Rohit Ushir — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ajtech.dev
Abhishek Joshi — Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
jesusmarron.com
Jesus Marron — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
firlana.com
Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
rileyadair.com
Riley Adair — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
daymxn.com
Daymon · Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
anupam.app
Anupam Singh — Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
jesusrtech.com
Jesus Rodriguez — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
deeoneandonly.com
Dee Xie | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
nihatkarahan.com
Nihat Karahan — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
quekkyz.com
Zheng Seng | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.