Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to abbygolfo.com

Abby Golfo — Designer and Researcher · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
egekokel.com
Ege Kökel — Designer & Researcher
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
lucisonline.com
Luc — Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
createdbymasha.com
Maria — Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
p-nam.com
Nam Pham - Design Researcher
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
ludovicapolo.com
Ludovica Polo / visual designer & researcher
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
ashlyncassity.com
Ashlyn Cassity | Senior UX Designer & Researcher
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
juliayaodesign.com
Jyue-An (Julia) Yao — UX Researcher & Experience Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
rebeccafavorito.com
Rebecca Favorito | UX designer, researcher, and leader
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
brunoribeiro.com
Bruno Ribeiro | Design, Teaching, and Research
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
corycrouch.com
Cory Crouch — Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
ozanyetkin.com
Ozan Yetkin - Researcher | Developer | Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
thearjungoel.com
Arjun Goel — Designer Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
brunaebarros.com
Bruna Barros — Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
lucasrizoli.com
Lucas Rizoli — UX Research & Design
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
angusdonaldcampbell.com
Angus Donald Campbell - Designer + Educator + Researcher
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
mrigankiraj.com
Mriganki Raj | UX Designer, Researcher & Architect
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
jumudesigner.com
jumu — Brand Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
junuxd.com
Jun — User Experience Research & Design
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.