Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to abacatio.org

abacatio GmbH · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
abacatio.net
abacatio GmbH
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
83match
fado-consulting.com
Fado GmbH |
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
83match
rokocopredictiveanalytics.de 🇩🇪
ROKOCO GmbH
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
83match
rokoco-intelligence.de 🇩🇪
ROKOCO GmbH
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
83match
rokoco-analytics.de 🇩🇪
ROKOCO GmbH
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
82match
sensation-consulting.de 🇩🇪
sens.ation GmbH
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
81match
quotas-technology.de 🇩🇪
Quotas GmbH
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
81match
qmplus-gmbh.de 🇩🇪
QMPlus GmbH
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
81match
scopag.de 🇩🇪
SCOPAG GmbH
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
80match
promanco.de 🇩🇪
ProManCo GmbH & Co. KG
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
80match
innostruct.com
INNOSTRUCT GmbH
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
80match
kuhl-consulting.com
QL Consult GmbH
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
80match
pro-select-gmbh.de 🇩🇪
Pro Select GmbH
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
80match
smart-made.de 🇩🇪
Smart Made GmbH
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
80match
soluvision.de 🇩🇪
SoluVision GmbH
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
79match
acon-germany.com
ACON TRADING GmbH
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
79match
3n-consult.com
3N CONSULT GmbH |
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry
79match
splus-consulting.de 🇩🇪
strategyplus GmbH
1 shared topicsmanagement-consulting-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.