Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to aadaga.com

ADAGA · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
50match
adylight.com
Il mio negozio
0 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
50match
boostmyn.com
boostmyn
0 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
42match
3lretailmoda.com
– 3L
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
42match
4morishop.com
4morishop
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
42match
aascente.com
– AASCENTE
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
42match
ferdinicol.com
– Il mio negozio
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
42match
geroatelier.com
– Officina da Laura
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
42match
3dprintech.it 🇮🇹
– 3D-PRINTECH
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
42match
6online.it 🇮🇹
– 6online
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
38match
aljisir.com
Aljisir
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
38match
ciellecasalinghi.it 🇮🇹
Cielle Casalinghi
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
35match
manoloema.com
BaGOO
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
35match
humaniintelligence.com
HUMAN INTELLIGENCE
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
35match
allattasenzadolore.com
Il mio negozio
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
35match
a-paisley.com
Ablativ Paisley
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
35match
amazonplus.it 🇮🇹
Amazon Plus
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
35match
casamiashop.it 🇮🇹
CasaMia Shop
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
33match
affisso.com
Affisso
0 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.