Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to a4r.dev

Bea Archer - Portfolio Site · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
adhrin.dev
Adhrin - Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
kumarsujay.dev
Sujay Kumar - Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
matin.dev
Matin Nikookar - Portfolio 2023
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
mayukhsinha.com
Mayukh Sinha - Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
robertnant.com
Robert's Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
faridahmadov.com
My Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
arinsoni.com
Arin Soni – Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
akshayhmulky.com
Akshay H Mulky - Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
3urobeat.com
3urobeat - Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
nghongray.com
Ng Hong Ray | Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
kumjudebama.com
Kum Jude Bama | Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
abalimustafa.com
Mustafa Abali | Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
0xoffsec.com
Portfolio App
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
soniahan.dev
Sonia Han Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
roblessard.com
Portfolio of Rob Lessard
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
softwarepainter.com
Pragun — Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
akanshsirohi.dev
Akansh Sirohi | Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
benschylling.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.