similar sites

Sites similar to 5yearsback.com

Five Years Back · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

TWO YEARS | by author Max Tower

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

ayearofyarns.com

A Year of Yarns

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Journal :: 18 Years of Evolutionary Logic

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

4everfloating.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

decadesauthor.com

DECADES – A memoir of 80 years of living

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

rufusyoungblood.com

20 years in Secret Service by Rufus W. Youngblood

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

deanlabowitz.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

nextfiveminutes.com

The Next Five Minutes

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Bears and Eagles - Home

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

saratogabookclub.com

Saratoga Book Club | 22 Years of Reading Books Together!

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

deancollinsauthor.com

Dean Collins Books

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

decadejournal.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

ayearofreadingindia.com

Another Year Of Reading

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Melior — Write your year into a book

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

5wisdomsproject.com

The Five Wisdoms Project

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Novaliqe - Story structure analysis and plot support for writers

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.