Piperic Business Intelligence

similar sites

Sites similar to 5iljang.com

네이버 · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation

1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

주식회사 경영산업

1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

나라베스트 - 똑똑한 소비의 시작

1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

젠체스토리의 오후몰

1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

BON수원영통프리미엄아울렛

1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

퍼스트사무용가구

1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

원목가구전문 키즈우드

1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

JH시스템-UPS전문기업

1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryhousehold-supplies

직구통 - 중국배대지, 타오바오 배대지

1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

직구만랩 - 중국직구만렙을 위한 직구만랩

1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

1 co-citations0 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

co-citations how often the same third-party websites link out to both — sites referenced together tend to serve the same world.
shared tech how much of their technology stack (CMS, e‑commerce, analytics, frameworks…) overlaps.
shared category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
positioning how closely their titles and on‑page wording line up.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.