Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to 5ampublishing.com

Home - 5 AM Publishing · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
fancyplow.com
Home - Fancy Plow Publishing
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
73match
fearless-games.com
Fearless Publishing
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
70match
a1000years.com
Now & Later Publishing
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
67match
adamantpress.com
Home - Adamant Press
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
67match
acavernbetweenworlds.com
Publishing Company | A Cavern Between Worlds
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
67match
gs-morgan.com
Home - GS-MORGAN
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
67match
rmhamrick.com
Home - R.M. Hamrick
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
66match
alexanderputzbooks.com
Home - Alexander Putz
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
66match
intermatemovie.com
HOME - INTERMATE
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
66match
interactivescifi.com
Home - Interactive Sci-Fi
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
66match
rlhull.com
Home - The Worlds of R. L. Hull
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
66match
robynheib.com
Home - The Black Corridor
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
65match
3dnovatica.com
Home - 3dnovatica.com
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
65match
blueoranda.com
Blue Oranda Publishing « Fantasy, Science Fiction, and Action-Adventure
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
65match
themichaelandrews.com
Home - The Real Michael Andrews
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
65match
theleaphome.com
The Leap Home - A Quantum Leap Podcast
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
64match
thepassingoftime.com
Passing of Time - Home
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy
64match
rjrtalbot.com
Home | RJR Talbot
1 shared topicssci-fi-and-fantasy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.