Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to 4authormjjackson.com

Author M.J. Jackson · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
benfarthing.com
Author Ben Farthing
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
robkempton.com
Rob Kempton - Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
bgerensanford.com
B. Geren Sanford – Author site
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
bgarensanford.com
B. Geren Sanford – Author site
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
robert-lautner.com
robertlautner | Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
sotobooks.com
Author Site
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
cmillerauthor.com
C. Miller Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
robertlongwood.com
Robert Longwood – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
theotherjimhargrove.com
The Author Jim Hargrove
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
abdunnoor.org
Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
arleneabundis.com
Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
ditrapanipress.com
DiTrapani Press – Home of Author Mark Trapino
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
camilladelabedoyere.co.uk 🇬🇧
Camilla de la Bedoyere - Author and editor
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
inspireimpactco.com
TWU Publishing - AUTHOR RYANNE
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
bmoviecookbook.com
Author Nic Brown
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
roboliveauthor.com
Author Rob Olive -
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
gregglevoy.com
Gregg Levoy - Author and Speaker
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
instastem.com
Alexandra Siy - AUTHOR VISITS
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.