similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to 360tek.com

Matthew Flynn · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

matthewneeper.com

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

alexbchalmers.com

Alex B Chalmers

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Filippo Bigarella

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

theklemmercode.com

Matthew Klemmer | Software Engineer

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

mattmargosian.com

Matthew Margosian — Kali Portfolio

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

andrzejdyjak.com

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

matthewdeiter.com

Matthew Deiter | Systems and Security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Matthew Lentz - Duke University - Home

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

fedeabeledo.com

Federico Abeledo

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

mayankramnani.com

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

piotrmierzejewski.com

Piotr Mierzejewski

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.