Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to 360searchgroup.com

Home - The 360 Group · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
themavgroup.com
Home - The Mav Group
2 shared topicshuman-resources
74match
themathanygroup.com
Home - The Mathany Group
2 shared topicshuman-resources
73match
themaplecrestgroup.com
Home - The Maplecrest Group
2 shared topicsexecutive-leadership-and-management
71match
piersmartin.com
Home - Podium Group
2 shared topicsexecutive-leadership-and-management
68match
internationalassignmentsolutions.com
Home - IAS
2 shared topicshuman-resources
67match
artemis-humancapital.com
Home - Artemis
2 shared topicshuman-resources
67match
blusparcsolutions.com
Home - bluSPARC
2 shared topicsexecutive-leadership-and-management
67match
blusparc.com
Home - bluSPARC
2 shared topicsexecutive-leadership-and-management
67match
masingroup.com
The Masin Group
2 shared topicsexecutive-leadership-and-management
67match
thereworkgroup.com
The ReWork Group
2 shared topicshuman-resources
66match
acertitude.biz
Home - Acertitude
2 shared topicshuman-resources
66match
acertitude.me
Home - Acertitude
2 shared topicshuman-resources
66match
acertitude.org
Home - Acertitude
2 shared topicshuman-resources
66match
acertitudeexecutivesearch.com
Home - Acertitude
2 shared topicshuman-resources
66match
acertitudeintegration.com
Home - Acertitude
2 shared topicshuman-resources
66match
solnetworkafrica.com
Home - SOLNetwork
2 shared topicshuman-resources
66match
4dvelopment.com
Home - 4Dvelopment
2 shared topicsexecutive-leadership-and-management
66match
themindcultivator.com
Home - The Business of Belonging I Mind Cultivator
2 shared topicshuman-resources

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.