Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to 2ning.net

The Great Bear & Pleiades Publishing · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
distemper-memoir.com
Colonus Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
picbookspub.com
PicBooks Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
thelanepublishing.com
The Lane Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
1kfaces.com
Thousand Faces Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
dissonancerising.com
HOME | Cratefires Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
5sisterspress.com
5 Sisters Press | Publishing Great Stories
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
alexparkerpublishing.com
Alex Parker Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
greenvasepublishing.com
Green Vase Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
bogartno5.com
Bogart No.5 Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
intriguepublishing.com
Home - Intrigue Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
piqueraypublishing.com
Home | Piqueray Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
bellstreetpublishing.com
Bell Street Publishing - Home
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
bgjohnst.com
Tomahawk Writing and Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
binghamton.tech
binghamton.tech publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
blueboxaudiovisual.com
Bluebox and January Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
bluegatepublishing.com
Home | Blue Gate Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
blueleafpublishing.com
Nakia Kenyon | Blue Leaf Publishing Llc
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
fantasticalrealm.com
Home - Fantastical Realm Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.