Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to 100-mark.com

Home • 100-Mark's Archive · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
mattietk.com
Home • tk.gg
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
colinarchive.com
Colin Archive
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
pileofturtles.com
Pile of Turtles Archive
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
rooty.dev
Home • rooty.dev
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
andrewhong.me
Home • Andrew Hong
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
kwyse.com
Home • Krishan Wyse
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
thelinell.com
Home • Linell Bonnette
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
boilerkit.dev
Home – Nextra
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
colinbate.com
Colin Bate Archive
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
codercollabs.com
Home — CoderCollabs
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
masoudgs.com
Home • Masoud Ghorbani Sarini
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
matthallportfolio.com
Welcome • Site Setup
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
newsandtecharchives.com
News and Tech Archives
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
greezmonk.com
Greezmonk | The Archive
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
kyedo.dev
Home — Kyedo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
abhisheksaha.dev
Home — Abhishek Saha
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
coledashner.com
Home — Cole Dashner
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
therealdavidcole.com
The Cole Archive — David A. Cole
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.